I think the idea that
‘astrologers can see the future’ has done us nothing but harm. We cannot see
the future! Probabilities . . .yes – that's why our predictions are often
correct. Questions and issues, certainly – there is the heart of our craft.
– Steven Forrest
The question whether astrology can predict events is
something that bothers many modern practitioners although it was settled by
great astrologers like Dane Rudhyar long back when he wrote:
“Astrology deals with potentialities — even of
events. For any astrological configuration might refer to a great variety of
actual facts. Astrology deals with potentiality of meanings; it is the art of
giving valid meanings to every phase of our existence — our existence seen as a
whole from birth to death. To make of it a predictive science (and the very
function of any science is to predict what will happen when this and that
factor come together in clearly defined circumstances) is to deny its essential
character and validity”.
The elements of a horoscope are symbols. The function of
mythology connected with these symbols is
to present an image of the universe that connects the transcendent to the world
of everyday experience. A horoscope is,
therefore, an organization of symbolic images and narratives of the
possibilities of human experience. (some what parallel to a wave function of
modern physics as we see in the next para).
In quantum mechanics, the Schrodinger
equation (or the wave function) serves a similar purpose like the ancient
myths. It contains all the future possibilities of a physical system. A wave
function collapse is then a phenomenon in which a wave function, initially in a superposition
of several possibilities, appears
to reduce to a single event after interaction with an observer. This implies
that nature is fundamentally stochastic, i.e. non-deterministic.
On my blog site regular readers will have seen several
examples of how the same planetary configurations amidst the same stars gives
rise to several possibilities taking place all over the world. What makes the
difference? It is really dependent on human free-will. The interaction of the
observer with the “wave
function” of star images
so to speak is what gives rise to an event.
Traditionalists might still give examples where predictions
turned out to be right. But let us remember that it is not sufficient to get a
few predictions right. Do we know how many predictions were wrong? As statistically trained Serennu points out in
her twitter feed:
Serennu Astrology
@serennu May 23
Interesting fact: Out
of 10 coin tosses, you need to predict 9 correctly in order for the result to
be statistically significant.
Comments
Post a Comment