The Iran-US synastry

 

 

 

 

 

The Solar Arc directed contacts from Iran's natal chart to the US Sibly chart (as shown in the Solar Fire report) emphasize a multi-year process of unfolding tension, rather than pinpoint events on exact dates. Following Martha Lang-Wescott's approach, these asteroid-involved aspects highlight psychological, thematic, and behavioral dynamics playing out between the two nations' identities (Iran's Sun) and the US chart's structures.

Key activations in the list include:Sun square Mars (May 2018): Direct activation of conflict, aggression, or military posturing. In mundane context, this can symbolize assertive or provocative actions, escalations, or forceful responses that feel necessary but draining.

Sun opposite Neptune (2019): A classic signature of dissolution, confusion, deception, or idealism clashing with reality.

For Iran (Sun) contacting US Neptune, it suggests undermined clarity in dealings, propaganda, hidden agendas, oil/illusion themes (Neptune rules petroleum, deception), or weakened resolve in confrontations.

Sun square Niobe (2023–2024): Niobe, per Wescott's interpretations, relates to pride, arrogance, or excessive self-regard—often leading to a humbling experience when afflicted. Aspects here indicate overweening pride being checked or arrogant stances leading to downfall/loss of face. In geopolitical terms, this could manifest as national hubris (on either side) resulting in embarrassing setbacks, diplomatic humiliations, or forced retreats from inflated positions.

Sun square Bacchus (2027): Bacchus symbolizes excess, addiction, avoidance through substitution, or attempts to numb/manage discomfort via indulgences/escapes (including emotional or collective "highs" like ideological fervor or resource over-reliance). This suggests dynamics involving overindulgence in rhetoric, denial of realities, or addictive patterns in policy (e.g., habitual escalation or reliance on sanctions/war threats as coping mechanisms).

Sun square Eos (2025): Eos (the dawn goddess) often ties to new beginnings, awakenings, or emerging anger/frustration—but misdirected or premature. Wescott links it to anger that's displaced or poorly timed, leading to misdirected outrage or explosive releases that don't resolve underlying issues. This points to frustrated initiatives, anger boiling over ineffectively, or dawn-of-conflict moments that fizzle or backfire.

These Iranian directed aspects to the Sibly reinforce the core Mars-Neptune square in the US chart itself (Mars 21° Gemini square Neptune 22° Virgo in the Sibly). This natal aspect is notoriously linked to weakness in war/military matters, idealized or confused aggression, deception in conflicts, oil-related wars, dissolved boundaries in defense, or actions undermined by illusion/uncertainty. Mars-Neptune can manifest as misdirected military energy, scandals involving deception, weak or evasive responses, or wars fought on false pretenses.The directed Saturn (from Sibly at 22° Gemini) to Sun (21° Pisces in directed chart) further activates this natal Mars-Neptune square, adding Saturnian restriction, reality checks, limitations, or karmic consequences to the already nebulous/weak Mars-Neptune dynamic. This suggests structural pressures forcing the US to confront its inherent vulnerabilities in assertive or military spheres—perhaps through prolonged stalemates, resource drains, eroded public support, or forced sobriety amid illusions.Overall mundane synthesis for US-Iran relations (2023–2027+ timeframe):

 

The process describes a drawn-out humbling of pride (Niobe), addictive or avoidant patterns in handling conflict (Bacchus), and misdirected anger or poorly timed escalations (Eos), all layered over the US's natal weakness in war/conflict (Mars-Neptune). Rather than a single decisive clash, astrologers following Wescott see this as chronic, erosive tension where both sides grapple with illusion, overreach, denial, and eventual forced reckonings. Prideful stances lead to humiliation, excesses (rhetorical, military, or economic) become unsustainable, and anger flares without clear resolution—potentially prolonging proxy/frictional dynamics, sanctions fatigue, or shadowy confrontations rather than open war.This aligns with observed patterns of intermittent crises, diplomatic deadlocks, and mutual posturing without full resolution. The emphasis is on process over event—a grinding activation that exposes vulnerabilities and demands maturity amid confusion.