In short, the answer is No. As one media commentator remarked vividly this week, the European leaders have less backbone than a jellyfish, so all their wobbly concern about Donald Trump wanting to annex the Danish Arctic territory will amount to little in the way of an armed conflict. There may be some theatrics as in the deployment of European troops this weekend to Greenland. There will be lots of bluster from European politicians. But at the end of the day, the vassals will be slapped into line. https://strategic-culture.su/news/2026/01/16/will-us-and-europe-go-to-war-over-greenland/ The scenario outlined in the article paints a tense but ultimately non-escalatory picture, where US ambitions under Trump clash with European (particularly Danish) sovereignty over Greenland, but resolve through posturing rather than outright conflict. Astrologically, layering in Denmark's natal chart, the 2026 solar return (SR), and the recent New Moon transit offers an intriguing lens...
A debate once considered taboo is now erupting at the heart of French politics. Senior French lawmakers are openly questioning whether NATO still serves France’s national interests as tensions with Washington intensify. From U.S. pressure tactics to the shock deployment of European troops in Greenland, fractures inside the alliance are no longer hidden. French officials warn that blind alignment risks dragging Paris into conflicts it does not control. As Donald Trump refuses to rule out acquiring Greenland, Arctic security has become a flashpoint — and NATO’s unity is facing one of its most serious tests in decades. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LpDMleSTUTY France's precession-corrected Solar Return (for the year beginning October 6, 2025) and its progression to January 17, 2026, should serve as a compelling illustration of how progressed angles in a Solar Return chart can provide precise timing for when major themes activate key themes in the...